My Battlefield: PUBG's Lawsuit and Krafton's AI Pivot
Krafton's PUBG copyright lawsuit targets Free Fire, Apple, Google, and YouTube for alleged cloning and an unauthorized live-action film.
I remember the first time I parachuted onto Erangel. The roar of the plane, the rush of freefall, the frantic scramble for a weapon – PUBG was an obsession that defined a generation of gamers. Two years later, in late 2017, a friend told me about a mobile game called Free Fire. I downloaded it out of curiosity and was immediately hit with a sense of déjà vu. The opening 'air drop' scene, the shrinking play zone, even the way weapons were scattered across the map – it felt like looking into a funhouse mirror of the game I loved. Little did I know that this uneasy feeling would snowball into one of the most significant legal battles in gaming history.
At the time, I shrugged it off. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, right? But after Krafton, the studio behind PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, filed a lawsuit against Garena, Apple, Google, and even YouTube in early 2022, I realized the depth of the issue. According to court documents, Garena had launched Free Fire (originally Free Fire: Battlegrounds) in Singapore barely months after PUBG's debut. Krafton had allegedly complained immediately, and the two companies reached a settlement – but that settlement gave Garena absolutely no license to use PUBG's intellectual property. Yet here they were, in the App Store and Google Play, raking in 'hundreds of millions of dollars.'
The lawsuit wasn't just a vague complaint. It laid out, with surgical precision, how Free Fire and its beefed-up sibling Free Fire Max duplicated PUBG's 'unique game opening air drop feature, the game structure and play, the combination and selection of weapons, armor, and unique objects, locations, and the overall choice of color schemes, materials, and textures.' I could check every single box from my own playtime. The iconic red container drop? Check. The circle of death forcing players together? Check. The way you kit out your character? Check. It was like someone had traced over the blueprint and called it their own.
But here’s where the story gets even more tangled. Krafton didn’t just go after Garena. They pointed a very sharp finger at Apple and Google. These two tech giants had earned a fortune from Free Fire’s in-app purchases – they take a juicy cut of every transaction – yet when Krafton asked them to yank the infringing games from their stores, they flat-out refused. I had to wonder: how much money is enough to turn a blind eye? Even more eyebrow-raising was the inclusion of YouTube as a defendant. The platform not only hosted countless Free Fire gameplay videos, but also a Chinese live-action film called Biubiubiu, which Krafton described as 'an unauthorized adaptation of Battlegrounds, depicting a live-action dramatized version of Battlegrounds gameplay.' I watched some clips online; it was bathtime absurd – players in real life looting houses and frying-pan fights!
The drama over Biubiubiu exposed a bizarre double standard. Krafton had previously filed a copyright notice over a similar PUBG-inspired film called Run Amuck, and YouTube swiftly took action. Yet with Biubiubiu, YouTube stonewalled. The lawsuit observed, with some bitterness, that 'Run Amuck videos were posted by individual users who no doubt lack the deep pockets necessary to fully indemnify YouTube from liability,' while Biubiubiu apparently had corporate backing. Money talked, and fair play walked.
Krafton also drew comparisons to a 2020 case where Ubisoft sued Apple, Google, and a developer called Ejoy over a blatant Rainbow Six Siege mobile clone. In that instance, Apple and Google refused to act until Ubisoft filed suit; only then did the infringing developer remove the game on its own. Neither marketplace ever lifted a finger independently. The message was clear: creators have to fight tooth and nail just to get storefronts to obey the law.
What’s at stake? Krafton demanded injunctions to halt sales of Free Fire and Free Fire Max, the removal of related videos and the Biubiubiu film, and massive financial damages. Garena might not be a household name, but its parent company Sea Ltd. reported over $2 billion in digital entertainment revenue in 2020 alone. This was no small fry.
Four years have passed since that lawsuit hit the headlines, and while the legal gears grind slowly, the world of Krafton has taken a wild turn. I was scrolling through my news feed in late 2025 when a headline made me spit out my coffee: "PUBG maker Krafton is an AI defense company now." My favorite battle royale studio had signed a deal with a Korean aerospace firm, investing up to $1 billion to 'expand the physical AI ecosystem.' Suddenly, the company that once obsessed over chicken dinners was helping build war machines of a different kind.

Seeing this shift, I couldn't help but reflect on the Free Fire lawsuit with fresh eyes. Maybe Krafton’s priorities had simply outgrown a messy copyright brawl. As a player, I still want justice – no studio should see its creation cloned so brazenly. But as a fan of technology and strange plot twists, I’m fascinated that the guardians of PUBG are now molding the future of artificial intelligence on a literal battlefield.
In the meantime, Free Fire continues to dominate mobile charts, and Biubiubiu probably still lurks in some corner of YouTube. The lawsuit may eventually force a settlement, just like Ubisoft's, or it might redefine how platforms handle infringement. What I know for sure is that the gaming industry’s wild west days are numbered. Whether it’s through courtroom duels or pivots into AI defense empires, the landscape is shifting – and I’ll keep diving out of that plane as long as there’s a battlefield worth fighting for.
🪂 Key Battlegrounds of the Lawsuit:
-
Air drop clones – Identical opening mechanics
-
Game flow mimicry – Looting, shrinking circle, final stand
-
Aesthetic theft – Colors, textures, even object placements
-
Monetization silence – Apple & Google profiting from copies
-
Content conundrum – YouTube’s selective enforcement on films
💸 By the Numbers:
| Entity | Role | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Garena | Developer of FF | Accused of extensive copying |
| Apple/Google | Platform owners | Refused removal despite direct requests |
| YouTube | Video host | Held a double standard on takedowns |
| Krafton | PUBG creator | Seeking injunction & damages |
Even as I write this, I wonder what the next drop zone will bring. Perhaps a new ruling will finally clip Free Fire’s wings. Or maybe Krafton’s new AI squadron will scan the digital skies for any further mimics. Whatever happens, I’ll be on the ground, pan in hand, ready for whatever comes next.